Teaching Minds: How Cognitive Science Can Change Our Schools--
"From grade school to graduate school, from the poorest public institutions to the most affluent private ones, our educational system is failing students. In his provocative new book, cognitive scientist and bestselling author Roger Schank argues that class size, lack of parental involvement, and other commonly-cited factors have nothing to do with why students are not learning. The culprit is a system of subject-based instruction and the solution is cognitive-based learning. This groundbreaking book defines what it would mean to teach thinking. The time is now for schools to start teaching minds!" (Publisher's description.)
While I don't agree that our schools are all failing, today's webinar title caught my eye - I have yet to check out Roger and his book, but I know first hand the amazing progress students make when the instructional focus is on building underlying cognitive skills necessary for learning. Student's intelligence can be developed. Students can learn just about ANYTHING and EVERYTHING with passion and creativity. And, btw, as a by-product of developing intelligence, they can master standardized tests.
Must be a good morning - along with the email notice of the Classroom 2.0 webinar this morning, Diane Ravitch takes a stand in the Washington Post on the Common Core Standards- (rotten to the core?--everyone eating the same apple? an apple a day keeps the learning away????) Actually, very eye-opening information about the origin of the current learning standards model - the Common Core. Whatever you think about Common Core Standards, Diane has some relevant points and interesting information on how we ended up with them.
The old adage in education--if they don't get it, repeat it louder, slower, and longer! --seems to still be at work in our thinking or our lack of thinking in how to reach all of our students. With a focus on learning and cognition, creativity and passion, we can nourish student's ability to learn.
Now, this sounds like a nice statement - but wait---I KNOW THIS! Working as an Educational Therapist for over 15 years, I have had the privilege of working closely with many students in a one-on-one environment, where assessment includes ongoing observations of student's performance, and direct, individualized instruction incorporates multi-sensory activities. With as few as 10 hours of assessment and 10 hours of directed, atypical, one-on-one instruction, the MAJORITY of struggling learners can jump several grade levels in their performance. If we are serious about student achievement, then I know we have time for 20 hours of individualized work with every student who needs it! Schools have students 180 days a year, at least 6 hours a day for twelve or more years. Instead of heaping on more and more classes and repeating material from year to year, we can address learning directly through cognitive science strategies, preparing the students for intellectual growth, and mastery of skills.
At the same time the we organize our resources to provide individual, direct instruction to our struggling learners, we can integrate many learning strategies and accommodations to support LEARNING in the classroom so that more students are successful without special intervention. Students can personalize their own box of learning tools, and decide which tool to use for which task. Technology--- BYOD environments, a plethora of apps, provide multiple multi-sensory routes for students to read, research, write, and coalesce learning. See Ira Socal's ToolKit Theory posts.
Practicing and mastering skills then becomes a series of successes, students become "motivated" ---(the only motivator is success) and they quickly become engaged in taking on new challenges, not afraid to make mistakes as part of their learning process. We are wired to learn - when will we trust this? Classrooms - both teachers and students - desperately need FUN for SUCCESSFUL LEARNING. Check out Larry Ferlazzo's links on developing a positive emotional climate for learning!
No comments:
Post a Comment